Skip to main content
· 11/14/1995

Sundheim v. Board of Cty. Com'rs of Douglas Cty.

Citations

  • 904 P.2d 1337
  • 1995 WL 94500

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “the use of a camera with a telescopic lens” did not transform a lawful observation into an unreasonable search
  • explaining that C.R.C.P. 106 does not provide a damages remedy
  • Because the division restored one of the plaintiff’s four claims, “[section] 13-17-201 is not presently available as a basis for an award of attorney fees.”
  • Because the division restored one of the plaintiff’s four claims, “[section] 13-17- 201 is not presently available as a basis for an award of attorney fees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davidson, Sternberg, Kapelke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.