Illinois Supreme Court· 10/18/2001

People v. Moss

Citations

792 N.E.2d 1217
205 Ill. 2d 139
275 Ill. Dec. 444
2001 Ill. LEXIS 1427

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that calling the defendant’s experts “ ‘cash for trash doctors’ ” was “completely unacceptable”
finding defendant’s poor adjustment to incarceration “as evidenced by his possession of weapons and his receipt of 44 disciplinary tickets while in prison” relevant to the comparison of criminal records of the codefendants
finding defendant's poor adjustment to incarceration \as evidenced by his possession of weapons and his receipt of 44 disciplinary tickets while in prison\ relevant to the comparison of criminal records of the codefendants
evidence that defendant previously sexually assaulted child properly admitted to show his motive for murder of child and her mother
Morask’s reference to defendant’s expert witnesses as “ ‘cash for trash doctors’ ” described as “completely unacceptable”
“A court may grant dispositional concessions to defendants who enter a guilty plea when the public’s interest in the effective administration of justice would thereby be served.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garman, McMorrow, Freeman, Kilbride, Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.