Kentucky Supreme Court· 3/23/2006

Ragland v. Commonwealth

Citations

191 S.W.3d 569
2006 Ky. LEXIS 251
2006 WL 733983

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reversing conviction because “[the expert’s] opinions based on CBLA evidence [did] not satisfy the reliability requirements of Daubert/Kumho ”
rejecting CBLA under Daubert [v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993)], but not finding a due process violation
“Miranda does not require a ‘talismanic incantation’ as long as the 9 warnings adequately advise the suspect of his Miranda rights.” (citing Prysock, 453 U.S. at 359-60)
“Miranda does not require a “talismanic incantation’ as long as the 9 warnings adequately advise the suspect of his Miranda rights.” (citing Prysock, 453 U.S. at 359-60)
affidavit for search warrant was based partially on evidence found during a trash pull
prosecutor's statement regarding the defendant's failure to testify was not improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cooper, Graves, Lambert, Part I, Parts I, Parts II, Roach, Scott, Wintersheimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

87 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.