Supreme Court of Colorado· 3/18/2002
Bernal v. People
Citations
- 44 P.3d 184
- 2002 WL 408642
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an out-of-court identification is admissible if “the totality of the circumstances does not indicate a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification”
- remanding to determine reliability when there was a six-week gap between the robbery and the photo array
- reviewing whether a pretrial identification procedure violated the defendant’s right to due process by creating a very substantial likelihood of misidentification
- manner of presentation is one of the factors we consider when evaluating whether a pretrial photo identification procedure was impermissibly suggestive
- “It is important to note that these two steps must be completed separately; it is only necessary to reach the second step if the court first determines that the [procedure] was impermissibly suggestive.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martinez, Coats, Kourlis, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- v. Dominguez-CastorColorado Court of Appeals· 2020-01-02· cited 1,418×
- People v. ClarkColorado Court of Appeals· 2015-04-23· cited 989×
- Golob v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2008-03-24· cited 954×
- People v. PhillipsColorado Court of Appeals· 2012-10-25· cited 855×
- v. ShanksColorado Court of Appeals· 2019-10-24· cited 690×
- People v. CarrascoColorado Court of Appeals· 2003-08-28· cited 687×
- People v. CampbellColorado Court of Appeals· 2018-01-25· cited 669×
- People v. HouserColorado Court of Appeals· 2013-01-31· cited 220×
- People v. BondsteelColorado Court of Appeals· 2015-11-19· cited 209×
- Garner v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2019-03-18· cited 193×
- v. AmbroseColorado Court of Appeals· 2021-05-11· cited 190×
- Ex Parte AmezquitaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-11-22· cited 182×
- State v. ANJWashington Supreme Court· 2010-01-28· cited 178×
- State v. A.N.J.Washington Supreme Court· 2010-01-28· cited 176×
- Nicholls v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2017-06-19· cited 99×
- People v. BrownColorado Court of Appeals· 2014-11-20· cited 92×
- State v. RioftaWashington Supreme Court· 2009-06-11· cited 87×
- People v. BorghesiSupreme Court of Colorado· 2003-04-14· cited 70×
- People v. CarterColorado Court of Appeals· 2015-03-12· cited 63×
- v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals· 2019-10-24· cited 61×
Cites
77 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 5,119×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,797×
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 3,001×
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 2,670×
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,081×
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court· 1985-12-03· cited 1,743×
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1999-06-14· cited 1,183×
- Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1986-06-03· cited 1,066×
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-27· cited 931×
- United States v. AshSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 868×
- People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado· 2001-06-25· cited 840×
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court· 1982-03-22· cited 691×
- State v. HenningTennessee Supreme Court· 1998-06-22· cited 606×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.