Skip to main content

People v. Mikula

Citations

  • 269 N.W.2d 195
  • 84 Mich. App. 108
  • 1978 Mich. App. LEXIS 2320

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that “where the verdict necessarily turned on the credibility of the complainant, it is imperative that the defendant be given an opportunity to place before the jury evidence so fundamentally affecting the complainant’s credibility”
  • Michigan's rape shield statute does not prohibit evidence of the complainant's sexual conduct with a person other than the defendant to explain the condition of the victim's hymen and vaginal opening
  • defendant filed pretrial motion asserting that police report contained an allegation complainant had been involved in a \sexual incident with a 14 year old boy\ before the offense involving the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walsh, Maher, Beasley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Mikula

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.