Veasley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a rebuttable presumption exists that a child under twelve years old is of tender years
• “[T]here is a 28 rebuttable presumption that a child under the age of twelve is of tender years.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).