People v. Hunter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• if the prosecution submits medical proof in a rape case, the submission operates as an admission that there will not be an assertion of any privilege when rebuttal medical testimony is offered
• if the prosecution submits medical proof in a rape case, the submission operates as an admission that there will not be an assertion of any privilege when rebuttal medical testimony is offered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Stanaway
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1994-08-29· cited 494×
• People v. Brocato
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1969-05-05· cited 214×
• Gale v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1990-05-02· cited 80×
• People v. Mikula
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1978-04-20· cited 59×
• People v. Keskimaki
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1994-08-23· cited 14×
• United States v. Walter John Henderson
  Sixth Circuit· 1970-11-10· cited 11×
• People v. Lapsley
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1970-09-28· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Van Alstine
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1885-06-03· cited 36×
• People v. Gallagher
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1889-06-28· cited 19×
• Lincoln v. City of Detroit
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1894-06-26· cited 15×
• People v. Werner
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1922-12-05· cited 15×