Skip to main content

People v. McKibben

Citations

  • 862 P.2d 991
  • 17 Brief Times Rptr. 648
  • 1993 Colo. App. LEXIS 119
  • 1993 WL 125079

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering whether the prior sexual conduct \tend[ed] to show the same peculiar and characteristic behavior pattern manifested in the crime charged\
  • “[A]ny error occasioned in the cross- examination of the prosecution’s expert witness was invited error. The witness responded within the scope of defense counsel’s question.”
  • admitted to show common plans, modus operandi, motive, and intent
  • the court did not err by admitting modus operandi evidence that the defendant befriended boys, treated them to movies and meals, gave them jobs, took them to his apartment, discussed sexual acts, and then asked the boys for sex

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Metzger, Ruland, Briggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. McKibben

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.