Supreme Court of Colorado· 4/9/1979
Pigford v. People
Citations
- 593 P.2d 354
- 197 Colo. 358
- 1979 Colo. LEXIS 568
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting a clear statement of legislative intent to change the common law in order to permit admissibility of certain prior offenses in criminal prosecutions for unlawful sexual behavior
- noting a clear statement of legislative intent to change the common law in order to permit admissibility of certain prior offenses in criminal prosecutions for unlawful sexual behavior
- statutes in derogation of common law are to be strictly construed to restrict provisions to the clear intent of the legislature
- while “[ljegislative acts in derogation of the common law will be strictly construed ... legislative intent which is clearly expressed must be given effect”
- criminal statutes are to be strictly construed in favor of the accused
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rovira
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. RathSupreme Court of Colorado· 2002-04-08· cited 792×
- People v. Thoro Products Co.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2002-04-29· cited 460×
- People v. LoweSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-04-04· cited 244×
- People v. SnyderSupreme Court of Colorado· 1994-05-23· cited 125×
- People v. HrapskiSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-02-22· cited 123×
- Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. v. KeelanSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-11-23· cited 96×
- People v. RoybalSupreme Court of Colorado· 1980-11-17· cited 86×
- Bloomer v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-10-09· cited 83×
- Stephen v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-02-22· cited 50×
- Gallegos v. PhippsSupreme Court of Colorado· 1989-09-18· cited 50×
- Martin v. Montezuma-Cortez School District Re-1Supreme Court of Colorado· 1992-10-26· cited 42×
- Bayer v. Crested Butte Mountain Resort, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1998-06-22· cited 41×
- Adrian v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1989-03-13· cited 37×
- People v. McClureSupreme Court of Colorado· 1989-09-18· cited 36×
- People v. McKibbenColorado Court of Appeals· 1993-04-22· cited 31×
- Bowers v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1980-10-06· cited 31×
- People v. MathesColorado Court of Appeals· 1985-02-21· cited 29×
- Hartley v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado· 1988-11-28· cited 28×
- City of Aspen v. MeseroleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-12-24· cited 27×
- People v. WilliamsColorado Court of Appeals· 1995-01-26· cited 25×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-01-16· cited 147×
- People v. CornelisonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1977-01-10· cited 55×
- State v. HamptonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1974-12-07· cited 43×
- State v. ThomasArizona Supreme Court· 1973-11-15· cited 36×
- Board of County Com'rs of Pitkin County v. PfeiferSupreme Court of Colorado· 1976-03-22· cited 35×
- Alvarez v. District Ct. in & for City & Cty. of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado· 1974-08-06· cited 28×
- Allan v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1976-05-28· cited 22×
- Jett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1974-07-22· cited 20×
- People v. MoenSupreme Court of Colorado· 1974-09-23· cited 15×
- Dockerty v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1923-10-01· cited 14×
- Huerta v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1969-02-24· cited 12×
- People v. PigfordColorado Court of Appeals· 1978-06-26· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.