Michigan Supreme Court· 6/14/1994

People v. Malone

Citations

518 N.W.2d 418
445 Mich. 369

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that MRE 801(d) parallels FRE 801(d)
“[S]tatements of identification are not limited by whether the out-of-court declaration is denied or affirmed at trial.”
allowance of “statements of identification are not limited by whether the out-of-court declaration is denied or affirmed at trial”
statements that are not hearsay under MRE 801(d)(1) may be used as substantive evidence
statements that are not hearsay under MRE 801(d)(1) may be used as substantive evidence
“As long as the statement is one of identification, Rule 801(d)(1)(C) permits the substantive use of any prior statement of identification by a witness as non-hearsay, provided the witness is available for cross-examination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brickley, Riley, Griffin, Mallett, Boyle, Levin, Cavanagh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.