Skip to main content

People v. Davis

Citations

  • 617 N.W.2d 381
  • 241 Mich. App. 697

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “this Court has stated that positive identification by witnesses may be sufficient to support a conviction of a crime.”
  • noting that the failure to provide authority for a claim of error results in the claim being abandoned
  • noting that “[t]he credibility of identification testimony is a question for the trier of fact that [this Court does] not resolve anew”
  • indicating that positive identification by a witness may provide sufficient support for a defendant’s conviction
  • explaining that even if a discrepancy exists between a witness’s “initial description and defendant’s actual appearance,” the discrepancy only has relevance “to the weight of [the identification], not to its admissibility”
  • “The credibility of identification testimony is a question for the trier of fact that we do not resolve anew.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffin, Holbrook, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.