People v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Michigan version of Rule 609 “was not intended to apply where evidence of prior convictions is offered to rebut specific statements of the defendant who testifies at trial”
• “[E]vidence of prior criminal offenses which qualify as similar-acts evidence under MRE 404(b) may be admissible if offered for the purposes permitted by that rule.”
• analyzing comparable Mich. Evid.R. 609

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Oscar Moore
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1987-11-16· cited 42×
• People of Michigan v. Darrell John Wilder
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2018-06-15· cited 21×
• People v. Hall
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-05-18· cited 10×
• State v. Serrano
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-30· cited 9×
• People v. Esper
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1986-10-07· cited 2×
• State v. Corey Steven Kubat
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2015-05-13· cited 1×
• People of Michigan v. Jonathan Earl Jefferson
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2014-10-10
• People v. Hall
  California Court of Appeal· 2018-05-18

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Luce v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 2,427×
• People v. Golochowicz
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1982-05-17· cited 220×
• People v. McGillen
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1974-08-02· cited 145×
• People v. Lytal
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1982-12-23· cited 51×
• People v. Hayes
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1981-02-23· cited 31×
• People v. Lytal
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-03-17· cited 30×
• People v. Burse
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1975-06-23· cited 11×
• Cook v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1980-01-14· cited 9×