People v. Alexander R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it is improper for a reviewing court to assume a trial court erred in the absence of an affirmative showing of said error
• noting that trial courts are presumed to know and correctly follow the law
• noting the general and well-established principle of appellate review that the circuit court knows and follows the law
• noting the general and well- established principle of appellate review that the circuit court knows and follows the law
• noting the general and well-established principle of appellate review that the circuit court knows and follows the law
• noting the general and well-established principle of appellate review that the circuit court knows and follows the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).