Appellate Court of Illinois· 5/7/2004

In Re Jaron Z.

Citations

810 N.E.2d 108
284 Ill. Dec. 455
348 Ill. App. 3d 239
2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 457

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the respondent forfeited review of her due process challenge to section (iii) of the Act because she failed to object in the trial court or raise any issue at trial in connection with section (iii)
concluding that the respondent forfeited review of her due process challenge to subsection (iii) of the Act because she failed to object in the trial court or raise any issue at trial in connection with subsection (iii)
noting that “respondent failed before the trial court, and fails now on appeal, to state how she was prejudiced, if at all, by the application of section l(D)(m)(iii
noting, where a party fails to object in the court below, the issue is waived
stating noncompliance with an imposed service plan is sufficient to warrant a finding of unfitness under subsection (b)
reviewing court may affirm finding of unfitness on any one statutory ground and need not address any other ground asserted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fitzgerald Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.