People v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that since “the evidence as to whether the petitioner was mentally ill was conflicting, it was within the province of the trier of fact to resolve this issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Taylor v. Commissioner of Mental Health & Mental Retardation
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-08-14· cited 127×
• People v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-01-16· cited 39×
• People v. Wolst
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-03-29· cited 11×
• People v. Cross
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-12-02· cited 10×
• People v. Hannan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-06-21· cited 7×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections
  Supreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 1,402×
• In Re Stephenson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-09-20· cited 117×
• People v. Pembrock
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1976-01-26· cited 112×
• Fopay v. Noveroske
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-08-14· cited 55×
• Garcia v. Tully
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1978-05-26· cited 46×
• Lublin v. Central Islip Psychiatric Center
  New York Court of Appeals· 1977-12-19· cited 19×
• Schipper & Block, Inc. v. Carson Pirie Scott & Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1970-03-20· cited 13×
• People v. Jones
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1972-08-10· cited 4×