People v. Pembrock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that commitment under the SDPA required proof beyond a reasonable doubt, rather than by a preponderance of the evidence
• holding that commitment under the SDPA required proof beyond a reasonable doubt, rather than by a preponderance of the evidence
• applying rational basis test to uphold different procedures for SVPs and those committed under mental health code
• applying rational basis test to uphold different procedures for SVPs and those committed under mental health code
• applying rational basis test to different commitment procedures for sexually violent predators and mentally ill
• establishing the State’s burden of proving a defendant’s status beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).