Appellate Court of Illinois· 8/14/1975
Fopay v. Noveroske
Citations
- 334 N.E.2d 79
- 31 Ill. App. 3d 182
- 1975 Ill. App. LEXIS 2770
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court noted that “the law in Illinois clearly allows evidence of the defendant’s net worth and pecuniary position in cases in which punitive damages are proper”
- “when compensatory damages are in issue, evidence of a party’s wealth is clearly inadmissible”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Karns
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 2,352×
- Jonathan Woodner Co. v. BreedenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-09-14· cited 116×
- Elmer Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1982-06-16· cited 101×
- Liggett Group, Inc. v. EngleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-21· cited 77×
- Hepps v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-12-14· cited 71×
- Elliott v. RoachIndiana Court of Appeals· 1980-08-28· cited 62×
- LID ASSOCIATES v. DolanAppellate Court of Illinois· 2001-08-30· cited 61×
- MacGuire v. Harriscope Broadcasting Co.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1980-05-14· cited 53×
- Linda S. Babb v. Paul Minder and Carter-Jones Lumber Company, an Ohio CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1986-11-21· cited 49×
- Widener v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal· 1977-11-01· cited 39×
- Riverside Insurance v. PedigoIndiana Court of Appeals· 1982-01-20· cited 38×
- Department of Public Works & Buildings v. RoehrigAppellate Court of Illinois· 1976-12-23· cited 37×
- Hamming v. MurphyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-05-06· cited 33×
- Pickering v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-08-26· cited 32×
- Cox v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-05-14· cited 30×
- Manns v. BriellAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-06-09· cited 26×
- Walker v. Dominick's Finer Foods, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-12-31· cited 24×
- Stringer v. McHughAppellate Court of Illinois· 1975-09-02· cited 22×
- Winters v. GreeleyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1989-09-29· cited 19×
- Kessler v. ZekmanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-07-27· cited 19×
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1964-03-09· cited 8,531×
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 4,525×
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 2,076×
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court· 1967-10-09· cited 1,899×
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1964-11-23· cited 1,859×
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 1,335×
- Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 1,111×
- Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court· 1967-01-09· cited 933×
- Edwards v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 1963-02-25· cited 931×
- Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc.Supreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 896×
- Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. BreslerSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 794×
- Time, Inc. v. PapeSupreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 420×
- Beckley Newspapers Corp. v. HanksSupreme Court· 1967-11-06· cited 237×
- Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing Co.Supreme Court· 1974-12-18· cited 231×
- Barry M. Goldwater v. Ralph Ginzburg, Warren Boroson, and Factmagazine, Inc.Second Circuit· 1969-07-18· cited 205×
- Ginzburg Et Al. v. GoldwaterSupreme Court· 1969-08-13· cited 133×
- Dill v. WidmanIllinois Supreme Court· 1952-11-20· cited 90×
- Moore v. Jewel Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1969-10-27· cited 74×
- Leonard Davis v. Theodor SchuchatD.C. Circuit· 1975-01-22· cited 66×
- Cook v. East Shore Newspapers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1945-10-26· cited 51×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.