People v. Delongchamps

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• containing no discussion of appearance staridard or whether a reasonable person might have questioned the judge's impartiality
• construing Michigan General Court Rule 912.2(4), the predecessor to current Michigan Court Rule 2.003(B)(4)
• a judge, formerly a prosecutor, was deemed qualified because he did not personally participate in the prior proceeding and because Canon 3(C) requires disqualification only if a judge \cannot impartially hear a case\
• judge, a former prosecutor, need not be disqualified unless he personally participated in the former proceeding because rule required disqualification only if the judge “cannot impartially hear a case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).