· 4/13/2004
People v. Jorge G.
Citations
- 12 Cal. Rptr. 3d 193
- 117 Cal. App. 4th 931
- 2004 Daily Journal DAR 4564
- 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3242
- 2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 502
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \There is no reason the analysis should differ because this case involves the meaning of `punishment' for due process purposes under Apprendi.\
- \punishment\ for due process purposes under Apprendi involves same analysis as \punishment\ for purposes of ex post facto
- “punishment” for due process purposes under Apprendi involves same analysis as “punishment” for purposes of ex post facto
- “There is no reason the analysis should differ because this case involves the meaning of ‘punishment’ for due process purposes under Apprendi”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wiseman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.