California Supreme Court· 12/23/1996

People v. Gardeley

Citations

14 Cal. 4th 605
927 P.2d 713
59 Cal. Rptr. 2d 356
96 Daily Journal DAR 15380
96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9336
1996 Cal. LEXIS 6830

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding gang expert’s testimony admissible to explain assaults were gang-related activity and that Family Crip gang fit definition of “criminal street gang” under STEP Act
sufficient evidence where assault was committed in public, and expert testified that gangs often commit violent assaults in public “to frighten the residents of an area where the gang members sell drugs, thereby securing the gang’s drug-dealing stronghold”
sufficient evidence where assault was committed in public, and expert testified that gangs often commit violent assaults in public “to frighten the residents of an area where the gang members sell drugs, thereby securing the gang’s drug-dealing stronghold”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

327 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.