Michigan Supreme Court· 9/7/2010

People v. Jackson

Citations

487 Mich. 783
790 N.W.2d 340
2010 Mich. LEXIS 1712

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that remand for resentencing is required when a sentence for a concurrent offense relied on information related to a vacated conviction
noting the Court of Appeals may grant further or different relief as the case may require under MCR 7.216(A)(7
as far as possible, effect should be given to every phrase or clause in a statute
“When the defendant’s sentence is . . . based on inaccurate information, a remand for resentencing is required.”
“[A] defendant is entitled to resentencing when the trial court erred in scoring an offense variable, and the error affected the statutory sentencing guidelines range.”
“In order to file a proper motion to remand under MCR 7.211(C)(1), a defendant must file the motion within the time provided for filing his brief on appeal.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Kelly, Cavanagh, Markman, Hathaway, Young, Corrigan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.