Skip to main content

People v. Duenaz

Citations

  • 306 Mich. App. 85
  • 854 N.W.2d 531

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was “pure speculation” to suggest that the complainant’s knowledge of sexual matters, including vaginal penetration, was inappropriate at 12 years of age
  • “The victim was 12 years old when she testified in this case about what occurred when she was almost 8 years old. It is pure speculation to suggest . . . that the victim’s knowledge of sexual matters was inappropriate . . . ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Markey, Sawyer, Wilder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Duenaz

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.