People v. Jamison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that merely being permitted to keep belongings at a person’s home does not equate to a cohabitating relationship
• “While [unpublished] opinions are not binding precedent . . . , [this Court] may consider them as instructive or persuasive.”
• “[T]o qualify as a ‘domestic relationship,’ there must be a familial or cohabitating relationship.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Ellis
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2011-08-25· cited 461×
• People v. King
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2012-07-31· cited 269×
• People v. Brantley
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2012-05-17· cited 95×
• People v. Ratcliff
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2013-03-05· cited 19×
• People of Michigan v. Brian Robert Morrow
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2025-12-11

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1993-05-25· cited 319×
• People v. Morey
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1999-12-22· cited 222×
• People v. Hornsby
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2002-09-10· cited 146×
• People v. Hegwood
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2001-12-04· cited 121×
• People v. Spanke
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2003-03-26· cited 101×
• People v. Jackson
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2010-09-07· cited 99×
• People v. Williams
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-09-16· cited 53×
• Slater v. Ann Arbor Public Schools Board of Education
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2002-06-26· cited 52×
• Title Office, Inc. v. Van Buren County Treasurer
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2004-03-09· cited 47×