Skip to main content

People v. Howell

Citations

  • 238 N.W.2d 148
  • 396 Mich. 16

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a statute may be challenged for vagueness on three grounds, one of which is when a statute is overly broad and impinges on First Amendment freedoms
  • finding forced fellatio and fellatio performed on a nine-year-old boy gross indecency
  • finding forced fellatio and fellatio performed on a nine-year-old boy gross indecency
  • court must confine jury to the acts charged if additional sexual acts are proven
  • N.Y. Sup. Ct., App. Div. 4th Dept.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kavanagh, Williams, Levin, Coleman, Fitzgerald, Lindemer, Helzer, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

95 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.