People v. Vronko

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defining indecent exposure as “ ‘intentional exposure of part of one’s body (as the genitals
• “All provisions of the Penal Code are construed according to the fair import of their terms.”
• “All provisions of the Penal Code are construed according to the fair import of their terms.”
• “A statute is not vague if the meaning of the words in controversy can be fairly ascertained by reference to judicial determinations, the common law, dictionaries, treatises, or their generally accepted meaning.”
• rational trier of fact could infer that the defendant was masturbating and that his penis was uncovered based on observation of defendant’s bare legs and his hand moving in his crotch, and it looked like he had something in his hand
• definition of \exposure\ in indecent exposure case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).