Michigan Court of Appeals· 6/2/2015

People v. Bailey

Citations

310 Mich. App. 703
873 N.W.2d 855
2015 Mich. App. LEXIS 1148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that this Court is “required to draw all reasonable inferences and make credibility choices in support of the jury verdict.”
holding that a more specific unanimity instruction was not required because of materially identical evidence and no materially distinct proofs regarding any of the alleged acts
holding this Court is “required to draw all reasonable inferences and make credibility choices in support of the jury verdict.”
stating that it is for the jury to decide the weight and credibility to be afforded the evidence and warning that the Court would not interfere with the jury’s role as the sole judge of the facts
noting that “it has long been settled that a complainant’s testimony regarding a defendant’s commission of sexual acts is sufficient to support 8 People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436; 212 NW2d 922 (1973). -5- a conviction for CSC-I”
rejecting need for specific unanimity instruction in a case with multiple victims and multiple charges of criminal sexual conduct because there was “no risk” of juror confusion regarding “their obligation to unanimously find that defendant sexually penetrated each victim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gleicher, Krause, Ronayne, Shapiro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.