Skip to main content

People v. Hicks

Citations

  • 518 N.E.2d 148
  • 119 Ill. 2d 29
  • 115 Ill. Dec. 623
  • 1987 Ill. LEXIS 271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prior theft conviction, which elevates theft from misdemeanor to felony, is a necessary element of the offense of felony theft and must be proved during the evidentiary phase of the trial
  • “Absent substantial considerations to the contrary, an amendatory change in the language of a statute creates a presumption that it was intended to change the law as it theretofore existed.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
  • “Absent substantial considerations to the contrary, ‘an amendatory change in the language of a statute creates a presumption that it was intended to change the law as it theretofore existed.’ ” (quoting People v. Nunn, 77 Ill. 2d 243, 248 (1979))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moran, Clark, Simon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.