Appellate Court of Illinois· 2/17/1993
People v. White
Citations
- 608 N.E.2d 1220
- 241 Ill. App. 3d 291
- 181 Ill. Dec. 746
- 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 180
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- focusing on prints being on inside surface of porch door; reasoning that, because door was to private home to which defendant had no special access, there was no innocent explanation for presence of prints
- applying the Hicks rationale to hold that the State must prove to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt during the evidentiary phase of the trial the fact that the victim was over 60 years of age to raise the degree of the robbery conviction from a Class 2 felony to a Class 1
- prints on inside surface of porch door of victim's private home; no special access
- applying the Hicks rationale to hold that the State must prove to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt during the evidentiary phase of the trial the fact that the victim was over 60 years of age to raise the degree of the robbery conviction from a Class 2 felony to a Class 1
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bowman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Monroe v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1995-01-25· cited 108×
- People v. ChanthalothAppellate Court of Illinois· 2001-01-12· cited 38×
- People v. BlanckAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-06-14· cited 35×
- People v. RamirezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-08-15· cited 19×
- People v. NorwoodAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-12-16· cited 18×
- People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1997-05-02· cited 18×
- People v. BilskiAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-09-20· cited 17×
- People v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois· 2017-05-12· cited 12×
- People v. FeldAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-10-11· cited 7×
- People v. MittsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2001-12-17· cited 7×
- People v. SimsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-07-16· cited 5×
- People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-06-26· cited 4×
- People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois· 2016-01-29· cited 2×
- People v. Mitts Modification on denial of rehearingAppellate Court of Illinois· 2001-12-17
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- People v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-02-22· cited 2,507×
- People v. PerruquetIllinois Supreme Court· 1977-10-05· cited 1,410×
- People v. KingIllinois Supreme Court· 1977-05-20· cited 1,292×
- People v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-01-30· cited 384×
- The People v. WeinsteinIllinois Supreme Court· 1966-09-23· cited 220×
- People v. PintosIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-12-21· cited 211×
- People v. YoungbeyIllinois Supreme Court· 1980-11-18· cited 201×
- The People v. MalmenatoIllinois Supreme Court· 1958-05-21· cited 140×
- The People v. AdkinsIllinois Supreme Court· 1968-11-22· cited 138×
- People v. MarinoIllinois Supreme Court· 1953-03-23· cited 96×
- People of Illinois v. RhodesIllinois Supreme Court· 1981-06-04· cited 91×
- People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-02-06· cited 90×
- The People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court· 1965-01-21· cited 51×
- The People v. FinnIllinois Supreme Court· 1959-11-18· cited 41×
- People v. BradneyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-05-19· cited 40×
- People v. HicksIllinois Supreme Court· 1987-12-30· cited 37×
- People v. RenoAppellate Court of Illinois· 1975-09-26· cited 25×
- Flynn v. CusentinoAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-01-11· cited 23×
- People v. EckhardtAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-06-26· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.