Skip to main content

People v. White

Citations

  • 608 N.E.2d 1220
  • 241 Ill. App. 3d 291
  • 181 Ill. Dec. 746
  • 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • focusing on prints being on inside surface of porch door; reasoning that, because door was to private home to which defendant had no special access, there was no innocent explanation for presence of prints
  • applying the Hicks rationale to hold that the State must prove to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt during the evidentiary phase of the trial the fact that the victim was over 60 years of age to raise the degree of the robbery conviction from a Class 2 felony to a Class 1
  • prints on inside surface of porch door of victim's private home; no special access
  • applying the Hicks rationale to hold that the State must prove to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt during the evidentiary phase of the trial the fact that the victim was over 60 years of age to raise the degree of the robbery conviction from a Class 2 felony to a Class 1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.