People v. Brooks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the State was required to prove that defendant knew he was delivering cocaine”
• \the State was required to prove that defendant knew he was delivering cocaine\
• the State was not required to prove that the defendant knew the offense of delivery of a controlled substance was committed within 1,000 feet of property owned by a public housing agency; the proximity of the property was an enhancing factor and not an element of the 12 offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Falbe
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2000-01-21· cited 89×
• People v. Pacheco
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-06-07· cited 36×
• People v. Durdin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2000-02-22· cited 22×
• People v. Daniels
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-10-13· cited 13×
• James R. Swofford v. Kenneth Dobucki, Warden
  Seventh Circuit· 1998-02-19· cited 12×
• People v. Winford
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-06-02· cited 8×
• In Re David B.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-09-06· cited 4×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re WINSHIP
  Supreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
• Colautti v. Franklin
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 971×
• United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1963-04-01· cited 902×
• People v. Gean
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 76×
• People v. Martin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-01-25· cited 62×
• People v. Valley Steel Products Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1978-05-26· cited 52×
• People v. Hicks
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1987-12-30· cited 37×
• People v. Brown
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1983-10-21· cited 24×
• People v. Jordan
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-12-30· cited 15×
• People v. Gramo
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-11-15· cited 13×