Appellate Court of Illinois· 11/6/1980
People v. Herron
Citations
- 412 N.E.2d 1365
- 89 Ill. App. 3d 1048
- 45 Ill. Dec. 641
- 1980 Ill. App. LEXIS 3868
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding Dunaway inapplicable despite lack of probable cause to transport defendant and noting even if defendant had been taken involuntarily to crime scene, the purpose was to ensure defendant's availability as a witness to offender's identity
- finding Dunaway inapplicable despite lack of probable cause to transport defendant and noting even if defendant had been taken involuntarily to crime scene, the purpose was to ensure defendant’s availability as a witness to offender's identity
- no description of suspect, stop within minutes of robbery and within one and a half blocks, it after midnight “and there was no one else around” and defendant walking away from store robbed
- no description of suspect, stop within minutes of robbery and within one and a half blocks, it after midnight \and there was no one else around\ and defendant walking away from store robbed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stengel, Barry, Stouder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Barts v. JoynerEleventh Circuit· 1989-01-27· cited 140×
- Barts v. JoynerEleventh Circuit· 1989-03-01· cited 58×
- Collins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1993-06-11· cited 58×
- Cox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-06-13· cited 51×
- City of Fargo v. OvindNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-03-30· cited 47×
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-06-26· cited 27×
- People v. BujdudAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-12-14· cited 25×
- People v. MoormanAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-11-29· cited 21×
- People v. CartAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-12-02· cited 20×
- People v. CanityAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-09-15· cited 17×
- People v. DeHoyosAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-03-28· cited 14×
- People v. SchachtAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-08-21· cited 8×
- People v. WeadAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-12-23· cited 4×
- People v. McGeeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-08-26· cited 3×
- People v. LippertAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-11-26· cited 3×
- People v. WeadAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-01-21· cited 1×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 3,633×
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 2,679×
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 1,403×
- United States v. CrewsSupreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 1,151×
- Reid v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 1,109×
- People v. ChestnutNew York Court of Appeals· 1980-07-08· cited 199×
- People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1976-01-26· cited 130×
- People v. McGowanIllinois Supreme Court· 1977-11-30· cited 105×
- People v. HoldmanIllinois Supreme Court· 1978-10-06· cited 57×
- District of Columbia v. M.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-10-29· cited 48×
- People v. DenwiddieAppellate Court of Illinois· 1977-06-30· cited 27×
- People v. SanfordAppellate Court of Illinois· 1976-01-22· cited 20×
- People v. Clark Memorial HomeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1969-11-12· cited 16×
- People v. RogersAppellate Court of Illinois· 1979-05-18· cited 14×
- People v. BlakesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1977-12-21· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.