Wyoming Supreme Court· 6/11/1993
Collins v. State
Citations
- 854 P.2d 688
- 1993 Wyo. LEXIS 105
- 1993 WL 195796
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that to determine the reasonableness of a seizure of an individual, the court will balance the interest of the government against the nature of the intrusion upon the individual
- concluding that officer had reasonable suspicion based on several factors, including defendant’s nervousness, his possession of pill bottle with different name, and presence of object hidden up his sleeve with handle sticking out
- a detention based on reasonable suspicion can, through the development of additional facts during the investigation, evolve into probable cause for arrest
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacY, Thomas, Cardine, Golden, Urbigkit, Ret
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1994-04-18· cited 132×
- Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2002-03-28· cited 87×
- McChesney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1999-10-20· cited 75×
- Springfield v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1993-09-21· cited 73×
- Compton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 51×
- Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1997-09-19· cited 43×
- Harris v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1997-03-10· cited 41×
- Willowbrook Ranch, Inc. v. Nugget Exploration, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1995-06-09· cited 36×
- Putnam v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2000-02-29· cited 32×
- Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2000-12-22· cited 32×
- State v. WelchWyoming Supreme Court· 1994-04-27· cited 30×
- Flood v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2007-10-23· cited 29×
- Seymore v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2007-02-23· cited 28×
- O'BRIEN v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2002-04-24· cited 28×
- Perry v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1996-11-15· cited 27×
- Custer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2006-06-08· cited 23×
- Ernest Ray Watts v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2016-03-31· cited 23×
- Christian v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1994-10-25· cited 20×
- Dean v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2003-10-10· cited 19×
- Martindale v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2001-06-13· cited 17×
Cites
98 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court· 1983-06-20· cited 3,374×
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 2,340×
- Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 2,036×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,950×
- Florida v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1984-11-13· cited 466×
- People v. MickelsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-04-18· cited 387×
- United States v. Dudley Lee Berry, A/K/A David Sarver, United States of America v. Jessica Linda Ann Zabish, A/K/A Joanne SarverFifth Circuit· 1982-03-19· cited 342×
- State v. OquendoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-25· cited 219×
- Ruyle v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-04-19· cited 200×
- People v. MurrayIllinois Supreme Court· 1990-05-30· cited 196×
- United States v. Rodney Lee MorganTenth Circuit· 1991-06-28· cited 173×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.