Colorado Court of Appeals· 12/31/2003
People v. Herrera
Citations
- 87 P.3d 240
- 2003 Colo. App. LEXIS 2039
- 2003 WL 23095447
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming that a noncooperative defendant does not lose right to bring defense of mental condition, despite lack of expert witness testimony
- â[T]he privilege against self-incrimination is not implicated by a court-ordered mental examination when the information obtained therefrom is admitted only on the issue of mental condition.â
- “The insanity statute protects [the privilege against self-incrimination] by limiting evidence obtained during [a sanity] examination to a defendant’s mental condition” under “§ 16-8-107(1)(a), (1.5)(a).”
- evidence derived from court-ordered examinations concerning a defendant's capacity to form the requisite mental state is constitutionally admissible
- testimony implicating defendant's culpability, not just his capacity to form mental state at issue, was improperly admitted
- “The right of a defendant to confront adverse witnesses is guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments and includes an opportunity for effective cross-examination.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Casebolt, Piccone, Roy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. MarkoColorado Court of Appeals· 2015-10-08· cited 656×
- People v. GrantColorado Court of Appeals· 2007-01-25· cited 320×
- People v. WelshColorado Court of Appeals· 2007-04-05· cited 53×
- Zapata v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2018-10-15· cited 44×
- People v. BondurantColorado Court of Appeals· 2012-03-29· cited 27×
- People v. HerdmanColorado Court of Appeals· 2012-06-07· cited 25×
- In Re People v. RosasSupreme Court of Colorado· 2020-03-16· cited 20×
- People v. MarshColorado Court of Appeals· 2011-12-22· cited 14×
- People v. GrenierColorado Court of Appeals· 2008-03-06· cited 11×
- In Re the Marriage of IkelerColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-12-18· cited 6×
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 1,932×
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court· 1985-11-04· cited 1,786×
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1966-11-21· cited 1,416×
- Olden v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1988-12-12· cited 592×
- People v. CobbSupreme Court of Colorado· 1998-07-06· cited 539×
- People v. GenningsSupreme Court of Colorado· 1991-04-22· cited 488×
- People v. District Court, Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado· 1986-01-31· cited 457×
- Blecha v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1998-07-27· cited 302×
- Lee v. County Ct. of Erie CountyNew York Court of Appeals· 1971-01-14· cited 195×
- People v. RoadcapColorado Court of Appeals· 2003-02-13· cited 185×
- Bernal v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2002-03-18· cited 172×
- People v. TerrySupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-05-14· cited 169×
- People v. IbarraSupreme Court of Colorado· 1993-03-22· cited 157×
- People v. ZapotockySupreme Court of Colorado· 1994-02-14· cited 120×
- People v. HarlanSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-09-11· cited 120×
- Merritt v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-11-23· cited 106×
- Hendricks v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2000-09-11· cited 94×
- Uptain v. Huntington Lab, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1986-08-25· cited 89×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.