Michigan Court of Appeals· 5/26/2004

People v. Harris

Citations

680 N.W.2d 17
261 Mich. App. 44

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that “[a]n appellant’s failure to properly address the merits of his assertion of error constitutes abandonment of the issue.”
recognizing that “[a]n appellant’s failure to properly address the merits of his assertion of error constitutes abandonment of the issue”
recognizing that “[a]n appellant’s failure to properly address the merits of his assertion of error constitutes abandonment of the issue”
holding a defendant cannot simply announce a position, and then leave it for this Court to “discover and rationalize a basis for the claim.”
holding a defendant cannot simply announce a position, and then leave it for this Court to “discover and rationalize a basis for the claim.”
finding that the defendant was allowed to cross examine an anonymous informant on surrebuttal after that informant’s identity was revealed in rebuttal testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoekstra, Fitzgerald, Talbot

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.