Skip to main content

People v. Grant

Citations

  • 30 P.3d 667
  • 2000 WL 1159037

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the fact that a defendant executed a financial eligibility form and the fact that a defendant was interviewed by a member of the public defender’s office does not constitute an unambiguous invocation of the right to counsel”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davidson, Ney, Roy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.