California Court of Appeal· 4/2/2007

People v. Albarran

Citations

57 Cal. Rptr. 3d 92
149 Cal. App. 4th 214
2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3495
2007 Daily Journal DAR 4378
2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that \evidence of gang membership and activity is inherently prejudicial\
noting that “evidence of gang membership and activity is inherently prejudicial”
“Given its highly inflammatory impact, the California Supreme Court has condemned the introduction of [gang] evidence if it is only tangentially relevant to the charged offenses.” (emphasis in original) (citation omitted)
lengthy testimony about other gang members and other gang crimes, including threats to kill police officers had little or no bearing on the guilt of defendant and \approached being classified as overkill\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woods

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Albarran

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.