People v. Dunn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the use of narcotics-detection dogs provides “significant utility to law enforcement authorities”
• noting that the use of narcotics-detection dogs provides \significant utility to law enforcement authorities\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• People v. Robinson
  New York Court of Appeals· 2001-12-18· cited 738×
• Immuno AG. v. Moor-Jankowski
  New York Court of Appeals· 1991-01-15· cited 247×
• People v. Kan
  New York Court of Appeals· 1991-06-11· cited 176×
• People v. Scott
  New York Court of Appeals· 1992-04-02· cited 129×
• People v. Cox
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2002-12-05· cited 115×
• People v. Weaver
  New York Court of Appeals· 2009-05-12· cited 114×
• State v. Wiegand
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2002-06-13· cited 104×
• People v. Hall
  New York Court of Appeals· 2008-03-25· cited 100×
• Fitzgerald v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-12-10· cited 95×
• State v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-05-24· cited 76×
• State v. Torres
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 74×
• State v. Scheetz
  Montana Supreme Court· 1997-12-05· cited 65×
• Commonwealth v. Feyenord
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-09-02· cited 65×
• Rodriguez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-03-27· cited 61×
• State v. Ortiz
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1999-10-01· cited 58×
• Porter v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2002-09-05· cited 52×
• Fitzgerald v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-09· cited 52×
• Myers v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2005-12-21· cited 41×
• State v. Rabb
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-15· cited 40×
• Jardines v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2011-04-14· cited 38×