Skip to main content

People v. Douglas

Citations

  • 496 Mich. 557
  • 852 N.W.2d 587
  • 2014 WL 3397201
  • 2014 Mich. LEXIS 1280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[w]hile credibility contests are not uncommon in criminal sexual conduct cases, the wrongful admission of corroborating testimony on either side could tip the scales and result in harmful error”
  • noting that “[w]hile credibility contests are not uncommon in criminal sexual conduct cases, the wrongful admission of corroborating testimony on either side could tip the scales and result in harmful error”
  • noting that “[w]hile credibility contests are not uncommon in criminal sexual conduct cases, the wrongful admission of corroborating testimony on either side could tip the scales and result in harmful error”
  • noting that in “credibility contests,” which are common in CSC cases, “the wrongful admission of corroborating testimony on either side could tip the scales and result in harmful error” (quotation marks and citations omitted)
  • stating that the defendant must establish the factual predicate for his claim
  • distinguishing between the trial court’s factual findings and the court’s analysis of the legal effect of those factual findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young, Kelly, Zahra, McCormack, Cavanagh, Markman, Vmano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Douglas

216 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.