Skip to main content

People v. Jackson

Citations

  • 498 Mich. 246
  • 869 N.W.2d 253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the admission of other acts evidence without the proper notice is subject to harmless error review
  • holding that overwhelming admissible evidence of a defendant’s guilt was sufficient to render a violation of Rule 404(b) harmless
  • holding that overwhelming admissible evidence of a defendant’s guilt was sufficient to render a violation of Rule 404(b) harmless
  • concluding that other-acts evidence was not unduly prejudicial because it was “necessary to counter the defendant’s theory that the . . . allegations . . . were fabricated”
  • concluding that no “res gestae exception” to the coverage of MRE 404(b) exists
  • holding that MRE 404(b) evidence “was offered for the proper, nonpropensity purpose of . . . counter[ing] the defendant’s theory that the complainant’s allegations of abuse were fabricated . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Young, Markman, Kelly, Zahra, Viviano, Bernstein, McCormack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.