Skip to main content

People v. Davis

Citations

  • 312 P.3d 193
  • 2010 WL 2105878
  • 2010 Colo. App. LEXIS 695

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, “by testifying that he told the detective ‘everything,’” the defendant opened the door to the prosecutor’s cross-examination about what he omitted from his prior statement
  • no error where the defendant said he told police everything, and the prosecutor referenced his more comprehensive trial testimony
  • a party who raises a subject in opening statement opens the door for the opposing party to admit evidence on the same subject
  • “In Doyle . . . the Supreme Court held that an accused’s post-arrest silence after having been given a Miranda advisement could not be used for impeachment purposes, because 7 the Miranda warnings implicitly assure the defendant that his silence will carry no penalty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.