Colorado Court of Appeals· 7/28/2005

People v. Lopez

Citations

129 P.3d 1061
2005 Colo. App. LEXIS 1205
2005 WL 1773911

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing the potential for jury confusion and advising courts that minimizing “the subject of victim credibility and using a limiting instruction of a type suggested in Dubria ... would alleviate any concern for potential unfair prejudice”
limiting instructions helpful to \alleviate any concern for potential unfair prejudice\
defendant testified at trial and made statement for inclusion in presentenee report; also distinguishing People v. Young, supra
particular argument on appeal that the district court erred in denying motion to suppress was waived where the defendant did not raise that argument in the district court
particular argument on appeal that the district court erred in denying motion to suppress was waived where the defendant did not raise that argument in the district court
no plain error admitting officer’s statements evidencing an interrogation tactic that “utilizes accusatory statements to produce emotional and physical reactions in a defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dailey, Roy, Kapelke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.