Skip to main content

People v. Daniels

Citations

  • 311 Mich. App. 257
  • 874 N.W.2d 732
  • 2015 Mich. App. LEXIS 1343

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that other-acts evidence can be admitted under MCL 768.27b because a complete picture of defendant’s history sheds light on the likelihood that he committed a given crime
  • stating, “Here, defendant unconvincingly claims that the trial court deprived him of his right to present a defense when it denied his request for an adjournment,” when the defendant “failed to offer any proof that (1) [the expert witness] would testify on his behalf or (2
  • evidence of previous domestic violence is admissible because the defendant’s history governs the likelihood that defendant committed a given crime
  • evidence of previous domestic violence is admissible because the defendant’s history governs the likelihood that defendant committed a given crime
  • evidence of previous domestic violence is admissible because the defendant’s history governs the likelihood that defendant committed a given crime
  • “Even with good cause and due diligence, the trial court’s denial of a request for an adjournment . . . is not grounds for reversal unless the defendant demonstrates prejudice as a result of the abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Saad, Kelly, Shapiro, Saajd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.