People of Michigan v. Derrius Lamar Thurmond

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a State’s sovereign immunity is not compromised “by an additional, nonsovereign plaintiffs bringing an entirely overlapping claim for relief that burdens the State with no additional defense or liability.”
• noting that the parties’ “course of performance” is “highly significant” evidence of their contractual intentions
• noting that “[w]e do not— we cannot—add provisions to a federal statute”
• noting that “[w]e do not— we cannot—add provisions to a federal statute”
• declaring that courts \cannot[] add provisions to a federal statute\
• discussing analogous withdrawal provision 9 in Southeast Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).