People v. Probst

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the failure of an appellant to include a report of proceedings deprives a reviewing court of the ability to scrutinize the reasoning behind a circuit court’s decision, a reviewing court should affirm
• holding that where the failure of an appellant to include a report of proceedings deprives a reviewing court of the ability to scrutinize the reasoning behind a circuit court's decision, a reviewing court should affirm
• “Failing to object to certain State evidence has a similar effect to stipulating to the evidence.”
• finding the defendant’s testimony alone insufficient to establish the affirmative defense of mistake of fact
• \Failing to object to certain State evidence has a similar effect to stipulating to the evidence.\
• finding the defendant’s testimony alone insufficient to establish the affirmative defense of mistake of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).