Michigan Supreme Court· 7/20/1999
People v. Stevens
Citations
- 597 N.W.2d 53
- 460 Mich. 626
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule did not warrant application of the exclusionary rule
- holding that failure to comply with the knock-and- announce rule did not warrant application of the exclusionary rule
- holding that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule did not warrant application of the exclusionary rule
- holding that the inevitable discovery exception should be available in knock-and-announce cases
- holding that the inevitable discovery exception should be available in knock-and-announce cases
- indicating that the exclusionary rule operates to suppress the direct and indirect evidence obtained from an illegal search
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weaver, Taylor, Corrigan, Young, Brickley, Kelly, Cavanagh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
52 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court· 2006-06-15· cited 1,222×
- People v. CallonMichigan Court of Appeals· 2003-05-29· cited 363×
- People v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals· 2006-09-24· cited 250×
- People v. KazmierczakMichigan Supreme Court· 2000-02-10· cited 230×
- People v. FrazierMichigan Supreme Court· 2007-06-06· cited 183×
- People v. AnsteyMichigan Supreme Court· 2006-07-31· cited 177×
- People v. TierneyMichigan Court of Appeals· 2005-08-25· cited 171×
- People v. HydeMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-09-01· cited 162×
- People v. Hawkins; People v. ScherfMichigan Supreme Court· 2003-06-20· cited 158×
- People v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court· 2003-06-20· cited 142×
- People v. GonzalezMichigan Court of Appeals· 2003-05-29· cited 138×
- People v. MahdiMichigan Court of Appeals· 2016-10-11· cited 92×
- People v. NunezMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-12-08· cited 84×
- People v. KellerMichigan Supreme Court· 2007-07-25· cited 70×
- People v. CusterMichigan Supreme Court· 2001-07-30· cited 69×
- People v. HellstromMichigan Court of Appeals· 2004-12-22· cited 68×
- People v. AtteburyMichigan Supreme Court· 2001-04-24· cited 62×
- Jones v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court· 2003-07-02· cited 53×
- People v. Sobczak-ObettsMichigan Supreme Court· 2001-05-01· cited 50×
- United States v. Christopher T. LangfordSeventh Circuit· 2002-12-31· cited 39×
Cites
53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
- Minnesota v. DickersonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 2,669×
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
- Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 1,569×
- Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-03-06· cited 1,325×
- Illinois v. KrullSupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 1,170×
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-06-23· cited 1,055×
- Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 983×
- Richards v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1997-04-28· cited 959×
- Wilson v. ArkansasSupreme Court· 1995-05-22· cited 925×
- Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 588×
- Sabbath v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 529×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.