Skip to main content

People v. Close

Citations

  • 867 P.2d 82
  • 17 Brief Times Rptr. 1021
  • 1993 Colo. App. LEXIS 179
  • 1993 WL 240188

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court’s failure to instruct jury on intoxication not error because of defendant’s tactical decision
  • the jury required to find that the defendant had knowledge that the principals intended to commit aggravated robbery and attempted aggravated robbery
  • Where a jury instruction initially referenced “a crime” and thereafter referenced “the crime,” “[t]his grammatical switch to the definite article ‘the’ clearly refers the jury back to the same offense which it established had been committed in step one.”
  • not selected for official publication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davidson, Hume, Taubman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.