Gohier v. Enright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the officer “did not misperceive lawful conduct caused by [the deceased’s] disability as criminal activity and then arrest him for that conduct ....”
• holding that the ADA generally requires proof that (1) plaintiff “is a qualified individual with a disability,” (2
• stating that \a broad rule categorically excluding arrests from the scope of Title II ... is not the law\
• stating that “a broad rule categorically excluding arrests from the scope of Title II ... is not the law”
• stating that “[t]he futility question is functionally equivalent to the question whether a complaint may be dismissed for failure to state a claim”
• recognizing theory but declining to decide whether it would apply to the facts of that case because the plaintiff did not pursue the theory on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).