Appellate Court of Illinois· 8/11/1978
People v. Bolden
Citations
- 379 N.E.2d 912
- 62 Ill. App. 3d 1009
- 20 Ill. Dec. 79
- 1978 Ill. App. LEXIS 3044
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “it was not necessary for the State to prove that the defendant knew the precise nature of the controlled substance” he was convicted of delivering when evidence established that he knew it was a controlled substance
- State not required to prove that the defendant knew the precise nature of the controlled substance delivered where defendant knew he was delivering a controlled substance
- “[I]t [is] not necessary for the State to prove that the defendant knew the precise nature of the controlled substance delivered.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Craven
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. McNeelyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-08-31· cited 26×
- People v. DavidAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-02-14· cited 20×
- People v. TuckerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-08-20· cited 20×
- State v. Nunez-MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-02-27· cited 17×
- State v. AliCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2009-12-15· cited 16×
- People v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-03-21· cited 15×
- State v. HernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-02-18· cited 11×
- State v. AliCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2000-07-11· cited 8×
- People v. PatelAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-09-11· cited 8×
- People v. CortezAppellate Court of Illinois· 1979-10-11· cited 7×
- People v. MataCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-05-12· cited 7×
- State v. MilesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2017-08-23· cited 6×
- People v. OttenAppellate Court of Illinois· 1980-12-09· cited 5×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CollinsworthIdaho Supreme Court· 1975-08-04· cited 42×
- Commonwealth v. TeadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-09-22· cited 42×
- State v. JenningsNebraska Supreme Court· 1976-02-11· cited 35×
- Doyle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1973-06-13· cited 28×
- People v. DawsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1975-07-17· cited 20×
- People v. JamesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1976-05-26· cited 16×
- United States v. William John NicklesFifth Circuit· 1975-04-11· cited 13×
- United States v. Alen Terry WhiteSeventh Circuit· 1977-09-14· cited 11×
- Mendes v. CoughenourSupreme Court· 1977-02-22· cited 10×
- People v. KruseAppellate Court of Illinois· 1976-04-22· cited 7×
- People v. PozziAppellate Court of Illinois· 1976-10-08· cited 6×
- People v. ThomsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1975-10-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.