Skip to main content

People v. Bolden

Citations

  • 379 N.E.2d 912
  • 62 Ill. App. 3d 1009
  • 20 Ill. Dec. 79
  • 1978 Ill. App. LEXIS 3044

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “it was not necessary for the State to prove that the defendant knew the precise nature of the controlled substance” he was convicted of delivering when evidence established that he knew it was a controlled substance
  • State not required to prove that the defendant knew the precise nature of the controlled substance delivered where defendant knew he was delivering a controlled substance
  • “[I]t [is] not necessary for the State to prove that the defendant knew the precise nature of the controlled substance delivered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Craven

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.