People v. Mata

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he purpose of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act . . .‘unequivocally manifests a legislative intent to restrict the transportation, sale and possession of controlled substances so as to protect the health and safety of all persons within this state.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Barrera
  California Court of Appeal· 1999-03-03· cited 33×
• Wishop v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-10-08· cited 23×
• People v. Polk
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-06-14· cited 9×
• Casey William Hardison v. The State of Wyoming
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2022-04-06· cited 5×
• People v. Polk
  California Court of Appeal· 2019-06-14
• People v. Polk
  California Court of Appeal· 2019-07-08

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bunnell v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1975-02-27· cited 270×
• People v. Aston
  California Supreme Court· 1985-08-08· cited 60×
• Canales v. City of Alviso
  California Supreme Court· 1970-09-17· cited 56×
• Commonwealth v. Teada
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-09-22· cited 42×
• People v. Camp
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-04-04· cited 22×
• People v. Oliver
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1979-05-21· cited 21×
• People v. Clark
  California Court of Appeal· 1966-04-29· cited 20×
• People v. Bolden
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-08-11· cited 16×
• People v. Diamond
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-08-24· cited 13×
• People v. Hardin
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-12-15· cited 8×
• State v. Bureau
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-04-02· cited 6×
• People v. Otten
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-12-09· cited 5×