Appellate Court of Illinois· 8/31/1981
People v. McNeely
Citations
- 426 N.E.2d 296
- 99 Ill. App. 3d 1021
- 55 Ill. Dec. 321
- 1981 Ill. App. LEXIS 3262
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that constructive possession is present when defendant has intent and capability to maintain control and possession of the contraband, and is aware of presence of contraband
- finding control where the defendant was the driver, but not the owner, of the vehicle
- inference of knowledge supported where bag containing contraband was partially visible from under the vehicle’s seat
- fact defendant was the driver, even when he had one passenger, was enough to demonstrate immediate and exclusive control of the area where the weapon was found
- Where the defendant is the driver of the vehicle even in cases where there is a lone passenger, he will have immediate and exclusive control of the inside of the automobile
- “because the defendant was the driver of the vehicle, and because he had merely a lone passenger, defendant had immediate and exclusive control of the inside of the automobile” for purposes of constructive possession of methaqualone recovered from under the front passenger’s seat
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Green
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. CondonIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-03-12· cited 107×
- People v. McLemoreAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-10-09· cited 28×
- People v. BirgeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-10-23· cited 26×
- People v. TurnbeaughAppellate Court of Illinois· 1983-07-21· cited 25×
- People v. ZambettaAppellate Court of Illinois· 1985-04-29· cited 18×
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-11-09· cited 15×
- People v. MasonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-05-09· cited 12×
- People v. WhalenAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-06-27· cited 11×
- Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-12-30· cited 10×
- People v. NemecekAppellate Court of Illinois· 1995-12-28· cited 5×
- Rivas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-08-12· cited 4×
- People v. McGeorgeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-06-22· cited 4×
- People v. KabakovichAppellate Court of Illinois· 1993-06-18· cited 3×
- People v. BowmanAppellate Court of Illinois· 1988-01-05· cited 2×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- The People v. MacKIllinois Supreme Court· 1957-09-20· cited 150×
- People v. BellIllinois Supreme Court· 1972-11-30· cited 86×
- The People v. FoxIllinois Supreme Court· 1962-05-25· cited 30×
- People v. McCartyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1981-03-02· cited 25×
- People v. DayAppellate Court of Illinois· 1977-09-12· cited 17×
- People v. BoldenAppellate Court of Illinois· 1978-08-11· cited 16×
- The PEOPLE v. HoltIllinois Supreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.