Illinois Supreme Court· 1/20/2006

People v. Bishop

Citations

843 N.E.2d 365
218 Ill. 2d 232
300 Ill. Dec. 107
2006 Ill. LEXIS 3

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that no one-act, one-crime issue existed where the multicount indictment alleged, in part, alternative theories, and, in part, that certain crimes were greater- and lesser-included offenses
holding that no one-act, one-crime issue existed where the multicount indictment alleged, in part, alter- native theories, and, in part, that certain crimes were greater- and lesser-included offenses
holding that a finding of bodily harm caused by the defendant could be inferred from a sexual assault victim’s testimony “that when [the] defendant began to penetrate her anally, it caused her to cry”
trier of fact can infer element of bodily harm or injury from circumstantial evidence based on common experience
the defendant was properly convicted of three counts of aggravated criminal sexual assault where the State focused on three acts of penetration throughout trial
the defendant was charged with eight counts based on sexually assaulting his daughter between 1998 and 2000

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Bishop

108 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.